Is the new Berkley Trilene Fluorocarbon good?
Jul 11, 2008 by Bob S | Posted in Fishing
i was thinking about purchasing this line for the invisibility, and for mostly finess fishing, is it good and stong enough to bring in some 5 lb bass?
I haven't used this line specifically, but this year I began using Berkley's Vanish Fluoro line and have been *very* pleased. My setup is spinning ultralight with a medium action 5'-0" ultralight rod using 2 lb. test Vanish, and I've pulled up some fish that were easily in excess of the line's rating, you just have to use the equipment as it's intended to be used, not hoist the fish up like a winch.
From what I've heard, fluoro makes a much better leader than a full line in the heavier weights, so I'd go as light as you can. For 5 lb. bass, I'd use 4-6 lb. test (duh!). From the research I did before purchasing the 2# Vanish, the biggest complaints with fluoro as a main line material were a somewhat higher amount of memory compared to mono, as well as increased brittleness. An interesting bit is abrasion resistance, where some people claim fluoro is much MORE abrasion resistant, and others insist that it's much LESS. I guess you'll need to determine that for yourself. In my experience, the biggest differences I've noticed while using Vanish (and that you can probably expect with Trilene) were:
-As the name implies, it's nearly completely invisible underwater. The 2# is to fine to begin with that when I first started using it, I was having trouble knowing where my lure was in twilight conditions!
-Stretch: fluoro line has almost no stretch, compared to mono that does stretch, moreso when the line is wet (which should be the only time you're concerned about it...). As a finesse fisherman, I love the instant response the no-stretch fluoro gives me for twitching lures and setting hooks, as well as instantly letting me feel the difference between current/lure action/bumping obstacles and a fish strike. In addition, I've gotten far fewer birdnesting issues with fluoro, possibly due to the lack of stretch when winding back onto the spool.
-Smoother casting: while this may not hold true for the heavier weights with the increased memory, the hair-fine 2# line I use casts like a dream, showing even less memory than the Stren 4# mono I had on my ultralight before the switch. This lack of memory translated into longer, more accurate casting for me, which is a necessity for trout fishing in streams...or bass fishing in weedy areas or in submerged structure.
Hope this helps!
coldskier0320 | Jul 11, 2008
yes very good line..... depends on the test (pound age)
cystuart | Jul 11, 2008
Yes it is, it's a little pricey though!
Dane Cruz | Jul 11, 2008
yes this is
magdy s | Jul 11, 2008
Yes, most Berkley fluorocarbon lines are great but Ive heard the new one is even better, i have yet to try it but the chances are i will be using it soon, as the old stuff is almost used up. As for strength, most Berkley lines hold it well.
AIRFLOW | Jul 11, 2008
It is ok, but if you want to get the best you should look into spiderwire
got_papers | Jul 12, 2008
How do you feel about fluorocarbon line?
Mar 18, 2008 by Dane Cruz | Posted in Fishing
I know a lot of people that think it's garbage. I used to think that , and I hadn't even tried it! I have since tried it, and boy what a 360 I have done! It really has it's place and time, if you ask me. Berkley Trilene 100% fluoro is the best I've used.
I like Triple Fish fluorcarbon, I have not used Berkley 100 % fluorocarbon but hate Vanish! vicious line makes a nice fluorcarbon.
jmay28711 | Mar 19, 2008
i think its good if ure fishing for carp on waters that are known to be hard but i wouldnt worry too much on the easier lakes
james v | Mar 18, 2008
Is great for ultra clear water and for live bait, but its WAY overpriced...................
M V | Mar 18, 2008
I use it as my leader most of the time and always when fishing for snapper in gin clear waters off the keys. Feel it increases my catch of yellowtail. I use Berkley Vanish and don't feel it's really all that pricy. It goes a long way only for leader use. Tight Lines.
gofish | Mar 18, 2008
The people who thought flourocarbon is garbage were probably thinking of the old stuff. The old flourocarbon was tough to tie, sank like a rock and stiff. Todays floro line is easier to manage, stronger and comes in leader or spool format. Because of the price (expensive stuff) people just use it as a leader material. Spool your reel with whatever line, tie on a 2 foot section of floro and it does the job. Ande and SeaGuar also make excellent floro line for leader material. 50 yards of this stuff will run you about 15-20 bucks. You have to think of it like this," do you wanna fish all day or catch all day?" Floro line will definitely increase your catching rate and makes it worth the money.
chimp dancer | Mar 18, 2008
I love fluorocarbon for fishing lures, it really has its uses when fly fishing, catches do go up especially when the trout are being awkward and wont take the fly because the water is too clear, no-more with fluorocarbon, does have the problems when fishing dry flies in that it sinks and pulls them under with it so i need to use co-polymer, but for lures like the woolly bugger etc its great, Berkley is good for bass and even catfish Ive found it helps, best and thinnest for fly fishing is airflo g3
AIRFLOW | Mar 18, 2008
I think its great as well, I use it as leader material attached to 10 # braid and I can throw it a mile, Invisible under water, good stuff.
The shop | Mar 19, 2008
Fluorocarbon Fishing Line
Get more be affronted and can be bankrupt by readily.
Compendium: I can not persuade Fluorocarbon fishing dance at this age due to gone and forgotten circumstance. I still get more irritability from my Power Pro (intertwine) and have yet to have it unevenness off with a fish.
They keep pushing the part about it disappears under bedew dilute and you can get hold of more fish in uncloudy O with Fluorocarbon railway, but I am a public limited company believer it is not the straight the fish are after, but what is tied on the end of the put.
Let me understand your thoughts on this testee.
Keep the Hooks Wet
Steve Mcgoldrick
Source: Fluorocarbon Fishing Line